I was curious when Howard County last considered and priced out a mainframe for a technology refresh or did a review of it's capabilities? Before any readers stop here and move on, I'd like to point out times have changed over the last 15 months, and it's worth a closer and more serious look. Most IT shops are not aware of the recent changes, hence the reason I'm asking.
Mainframe prices today are often close to what
...more »
I was curious when Howard County last considered and priced out a mainframe for a technology refresh or did a review of it's capabilities? Before any readers stop here and move on, I'd like to point out times have changed over the last 15 months, and it's worth a closer and more serious look. Most IT shops are not aware of the recent changes, hence the reason I'm asking.
Mainframe prices today are often close to what IT may spend to deploy a distributed application for even one department. Yet a mainframe is capable of providing additional services to multiple departments, sharing one of the most secure environments available. I have personally been involved with other government entities who have done the analysis and realized significant savings, one in particular cut their operating costs by as much as 80%. In almost every case, early adopters have consolidated their environments, and streamlined operations to unprecedented levels with savings of at least 30%. By example, if our IT budget is $10M a year, would it not be compelling to cut the spend to $7M?
I'm not familiar with the existing IT environment within the County, but if we're running 30 to 50 servers or more, additional research would be prudent. We have nothing to lose. The perception of the mainframe is decades old. For those unfamiliar, the most recent mainframes leverage Linux; they have the ability to closely integrate Intel blade servers running Windows applications, specialty devices to accelerate data queries, security, and specialty processors to handle Java applications. All of these things have a compelling impact on cutting costs while increasing performance and services to users.
I realize the mainframe does some things better than the distributed environment, and vice versa, so it's important to realize a "right fit for purpose" when looking at what applications are running on what platform. The mainframe excels at cloud offerings, social computing apps, databases, online transaction processing and batch. Distributed excels at processor intensive apps. If we're moving ahead with initiatives that would favor a mainframe, I think it would be of benefit to evaluate all options.
In the spirit of full disclosure, I live Howard County and I work for IBM. But I raise the thought and question because I've been involved with other entities who have successfully taken bold steps and applied innovative thinking to the same challenges the County is facing today with budget pressure.
The Youtube link features some IBM customers (i.e., State of Virginia) talking about how they're doing some new things for less money on the mainframe. The channel also contains similar references including Miami Dade County.
« less
full details »
Social Web